Stored Category Comparison

Kiwi Ears KE4 vs Noble Audio Onyx

This page compares two published iems profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Back to Kiwi Ears KE4Open Noble Audio Onyx

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

Kiwi Ears KE4
Noble Audio Onyx

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisKE4OnyxDelta
Bass
8.2
8.8
+0.6
Mids
8.3
8.7
+0.4
Treble
7.3
8.6
+1.3
Technicalities
7.7
9
+1.3
Soundstage
7.4
8.9
+1.5
Value
8.2
7.3
-0.9

Compare To

Compare this iems against another stored profile.

Kiwi Ears KE4 can only be compared against published iems profiles.

Quick Read

Kiwi Ears KE4

The KE4 is Kiwi Ears' $199 hybrid built around a dual dynamic isobaric bass module plus two balanced armatures, and it became the community's shorthand for 'new meta' tuning: a warm-neutral target with elevated but tidy bass, natural mids, and deliberately safe treble. Approved coverage describes a nicely balanced, relaxing set with decent-to-good resolution for the price and better comfort than bulkier competitors like the Blessing 3. The flip side of the consensus: it is a tuning showcase rather than a technical one. Staging and detail are competent, not headline-grabbing, and treble-first listeners find it too polite.

Noble Audio Onyx

Across Headfonia and Bloom’s approved coverage, the Onyx comes through as a premium, neutral-warm quadbrid that majors on polish, immersion, and textured low-end power rather than exaggerated V-shape theatrics. The bass is repeatedly described as strong and controlled, the mids clear and full, and the stage spacious enough to give flagship material a convincing sense of scale. The Onyx is also framed as an endgame-style listen with upscale build and presentation. Its compromises are predictable for the class: price is steep, and its character leans more toward refined fullness and immersive richness than aggressive excitement.

Kiwi Ears • IEMs

Kiwi Ears KE4

Open page

The KE4 is Kiwi Ears' $199 hybrid built around a dual dynamic isobaric bass module plus two balanced armatures, and it became the community's shorthand for 'new meta' tuning: a warm-neutral target with elevated but tidy bass, natural mids, and deliberately safe treble. Approved coverage describes a nicely balanced, relaxing set with decent-to-good resolution for the price and better comfort than bulkier competitors like the Blessing 3. The flip side of the consensus: it is a tuning showcase rather than a technical one. Staging and detail are competent, not headline-grabbing, and treble-first listeners find it too polite.

Strengths

  • Benchmark warm-neutral 'meta' tuning with natural, coherent mids
  • Isobaric dual-DD bass has very good quality and tasteful lift
  • More comfortable than several same-price hybrids, including Blessing 3

Weaknesses

  • Technical performance is good rather than standout for $199
  • Safe treble tuning lacks sparkle for energy-seeking listeners
  • Staging is average in width and depth

Noble Audio • IEMs

Noble Audio Onyx

Open page

Across Headfonia and Bloom’s approved coverage, the Onyx comes through as a premium, neutral-warm quadbrid that majors on polish, immersion, and textured low-end power rather than exaggerated V-shape theatrics. The bass is repeatedly described as strong and controlled, the mids clear and full, and the stage spacious enough to give flagship material a convincing sense of scale. The Onyx is also framed as an endgame-style listen with upscale build and presentation. Its compromises are predictable for the class: price is steep, and its character leans more toward refined fullness and immersive richness than aggressive excitement.

Strengths

  • Controlled, textured low end with real flagship scale
  • Clear, full mids with strong spatial placement
  • Premium build, cable, and overall presentation

Weaknesses

  • Very expensive even in the flagship segment
  • Less overtly thrilling than more aggressive V-shaped competitors
  • Best value depends on already shopping at the endgame tier