Stored Category Comparison

FiiO M11S vs HiBy R3 Pro II

This page compares two published daps profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

FiiO M11S
HiBy R3 Pro II

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisM11SR3 Pro IIDelta
Bass
7
7.5
+0.5
Mids
6.9
7.7
+0.8
Treble
6.9
7.5
+0.6
Technicalities
7.2
7
-0.2
Soundstage
6.8
7.1
+0.3
Value
7
7.2
+0.2

Compare To

Compare this daps against another stored profile.

FiiO M11S can only be compared against published daps profiles.

Quick Read

FiiO M11S

The M11S is FiiO's roughly $499 Android digital audio player, and the steadiest praise is physical rather than sonic: a CNC machined, polished matte black aluminium casing called flawless with no gaps, a glass back panel, and a 5 inch 1280x720 IPS screen at 300PPI running Android 10 on a Snapdragon 660. Three outputs sit at the bottom (3.5mm, 2.5mm and 4.4mm), and the 3.5mm and 4.4mm can each be set to line out instead of headphone out. A Mode Selection menu adds Pure Music, USB DAC, Bluetooth receiver and AirPlay modes for listeners who want to bypass Android. Inside are dual ES9038Q2M DACs decoding to 384kHz and DSD256, with FiiO rating the 4.4mm output at 670mW. Tonal accounts diverge. One review hears slightly shy bass fundamentals under a mid-bass with a lot of presence, upper vocal frequencies weighted ahead of body, and a top end smoothed relative to FiiO's costlier player. Another hears a sturdy bass foundation and a distinct clickiness in the highs. A third hears a clean but not cold sound with a touch of extra focus up top. Drive capability is the sharpest split: one listener reports plenty of power on tap and an enjoyable stretch with HiFiMan HE400se planars, while another had to push a HiFiMan Edition XS a little past 80 percent volume. Single-ended output power is reported as more limited, so balanced is the recommended path. Streaming rated well below local file playback in the one review that scored them separately.

HiBy R3 Pro II

Approved community coverage around the current R3 II and R3 Pro II naming cluster paints the device as sonically decent but operationally frustrating. Head-Fi reviews praise its compact size, acceptable battery life, and good value sound, yet repeatedly criticize the dim display, buggy software, freezes, and lack of meaningful firmware improvement. Reddit discussion around the R3 Pro II label points in the same direction: buyers are drawn to its form factor and build, but worry about long-term polish. The result is a very small DAP that can sound good enough for the money while still feeling held back by software execution.

FiiO • DAPs

FiiO M11S

Open page

The M11S is FiiO's roughly $499 Android digital audio player, and the steadiest praise is physical rather than sonic: a CNC machined, polished matte black aluminium casing called flawless with no gaps, a glass back panel, and a 5 inch 1280x720 IPS screen at 300PPI running Android 10 on a Snapdragon 660. Three outputs sit at the bottom (3.5mm, 2.5mm and 4.4mm), and the 3.5mm and 4.4mm can each be set to line out instead of headphone out. A Mode Selection menu adds Pure Music, USB DAC, Bluetooth receiver and AirPlay modes for listeners who want to bypass Android. Inside are dual ES9038Q2M DACs decoding to 384kHz and DSD256, with FiiO rating the 4.4mm output at 670mW. Tonal accounts diverge. One review hears slightly shy bass fundamentals under a mid-bass with a lot of presence, upper vocal frequencies weighted ahead of body, and a top end smoothed relative to FiiO's costlier player. Another hears a sturdy bass foundation and a distinct clickiness in the highs. A third hears a clean but not cold sound with a touch of extra focus up top. Drive capability is the sharpest split: one listener reports plenty of power on tap and an enjoyable stretch with HiFiMan HE400se planars, while another had to push a HiFiMan Edition XS a little past 80 percent volume. Single-ended output power is reported as more limited, so balanced is the recommended path. Streaming rated well below local file playback in the one review that scored them separately.

Strengths

  • CNC machined aluminium casing with a glass back, described as flawless with no gaps and premium materials throughout.
  • Three outputs (4.4mm, 2.5mm and 3.5mm), with the 3.5mm and 4.4mm each settable as line out rather than headphone out.
  • Android 10 on a Snapdragon 660 with a 5 inch touchscreen that feels as natural to use as a smartphone.
  • A Mode Selection menu adds Pure Music, USB DAC, Bluetooth receiver and AirPlay modes, so Android can be bypassed entirely.
  • Noise control holds up on high gain: very sensitive IEMs such as the Shure SE846 sit almost dead quiet in the background.
  • Dual ES9038Q2M DACs decoding to 384kHz and DSD256, with FiiO rating the 4.4mm balanced output at 670mW.

Weaknesses

  • Single-ended output power is more limited than balanced, so balanced cabling is the recommended way to get the most from it.
  • Some headphones need pushing much harder: a HiFiMan Edition XS planar had to be boosted a little past 80 percent volume.
  • In one account the bass fundamentals sit slightly shy behind a mid-bass with a lot of presence, and the low end does not kick deep.
  • Upper vocal frequencies are weighted ahead of the body in one account, giving softer voices presence rather than fullness.
  • Streaming sounded flatter than local file playback in one review, rated 7/10 against 10/10 for local files.
  • Firmware text carries spelling and translation errors, and at close to three times a phone's thickness it is impractical to pocket.

HiBy • DAPs

HiBy R3 Pro II

Open page

Approved community coverage around the current R3 II and R3 Pro II naming cluster paints the device as sonically decent but operationally frustrating. Head-Fi reviews praise its compact size, acceptable battery life, and good value sound, yet repeatedly criticize the dim display, buggy software, freezes, and lack of meaningful firmware improvement. Reddit discussion around the R3 Pro II label points in the same direction: buyers are drawn to its form factor and build, but worry about long-term polish. The result is a very small DAP that can sound good enough for the money while still feeling held back by software execution.

Strengths

  • Compact size and strong portability
  • Good enough sound quality and battery life for the budget segment
  • Appealing as a low-cost dedicated player if expectations are managed

Weaknesses

  • Buggy software and stability issues dominate approved-source complaints
  • Display quality and overall polish trail stronger competitors
  • Value case weakens if reliability matters more than form factor