Stored Category Comparison

FiiO JT7 vs Sivga Phoenix

This page compares two published headphones profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Back to FiiO JT7Open Sivga Phoenix

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

FiiO JT7
Sivga Phoenix

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisJT7PhoenixDelta
Bass
7.6
7.5
-0.1
Mids
7
6.8
-0.2
Treble
6.6
6
-0.6
Technicalities
7.1
6.5
-0.6
Soundstage
6.8
6.7
-0.1
Value
8.5
7.1
-1.4

Compare To

Compare this headphones against another stored profile.

FiiO JT7 can only be compared against published headphones profiles.

Quick Read

FiiO JT7

The JT7 is an open-back planar magnetic headphone sold under FiiO's Jade Audio sub-brand, built on a proprietary 95x86mm driver rated 18 ohms and 92dB/mW, weighing about 318g and folding flat for transport. Reviewers agree on three things: the mechanical design and comfort are unusually good for roughly $110 to $129, the bass is a genuine strength for an entry-level planar, and pad swaps move the tonality a long way. Past that the readings split hard. One camp hears a warm, full, slightly bass-forward headphone. Another hears and measures forward upper mids around 3-5 kHz, calling the stock presentation shouty and the treble blunted and uneven. Treble divides on the same line: airy and extended in several reviews, rolled off or troughed near 4-5 kHz in others. Drivability is contested too, from lean and harsh on portable dongles in one account to no measurable source dependency in another. The most serious single finding is mechanical driver clipping reported near 88dB SPL, audibly worse on one channel.

Sivga Phoenix

The Sivga Phoenix is a 50mm dynamic open back with CNC-machined zebrawood cups, stainless steel grilles and a listed 296g weight, and the physical product is the least contested part of it: premium materials with no visible flaws, a light clamping force, and a rated 32 ohm, 103 dB load that a phone or dongle drives without help. Tuning is where opinion divides. Listening-based reviews hear a warm, full-bodied signature: textured bass with sub-bass reach unusual for an open design, a lush and expressive midrange, and a treble that sits on the safe side of bright without fatigue. A measurement-based review reached the opposite conclusion, finding the response close to target only between roughly 100 and 500 Hz, with the emphasis concentrated at 200-300 Hz and a shortfall above, which it heard as dull and would not recommend in stock form. That same review reported a dramatic gain in tonal balance and spatial imaging once parametric EQ was applied. Soundstage width is also contested, called fairly modest and narrower than rival open backs in some listening and notably more expansive than a Sennheiser HD 600 in other listening. So are the stock pads, thin enough that one listener felt ears pressing against the driver covers after about an hour, while others logged multi-hour sessions without fatigue. Detail retrieval is a stated limitation: respectable, but described as neither the cleanest nor the most detailed at the price, with micro details sometimes going unnoticed.

FiiO • Headphones

FiiO JT7

Open page

The JT7 is an open-back planar magnetic headphone sold under FiiO's Jade Audio sub-brand, built on a proprietary 95x86mm driver rated 18 ohms and 92dB/mW, weighing about 318g and folding flat for transport. Reviewers agree on three things: the mechanical design and comfort are unusually good for roughly $110 to $129, the bass is a genuine strength for an entry-level planar, and pad swaps move the tonality a long way. Past that the readings split hard. One camp hears a warm, full, slightly bass-forward headphone. Another hears and measures forward upper mids around 3-5 kHz, calling the stock presentation shouty and the treble blunted and uneven. Treble divides on the same line: airy and extended in several reviews, rolled off or troughed near 4-5 kHz in others. Drivability is contested too, from lean and harsh on portable dongles in one account to no measurable source dependency in another. The most serious single finding is mechanical driver clipping reported near 88dB SPL, audibly worse on one channel.

Strengths

  • Mechanical design punches far above the price: 318g, spring steel headband, folding cups, replaceable pads and headband cushion
  • Bass is the most consistently praised region for an entry planar, described as deep, fast and physical, and it accepts EQ boosts well
  • Responds strongly to pad rolling, with aftermarket FT1 Pro, velour and ZMF pads repeatedly credited with smoothing the upper mids
  • Measured channel matching is called excellent for the price, with low distortion through most of the range at normal levels
  • Ships with both a 3.5mm single-ended and a 4.4mm balanced cable plus a 6.35mm adapter, so it drops into desktop or portable chains

Weaknesses

  • Upper mids near 3-5 kHz read as forward or shouty in several reviews, and the stock tuning is called uneven rather than refined
  • Treble is the weakest axis by consensus of the critics: variously blunted, rolled off, or dipped around 4-5 kHz
  • One detailed review reports the driver clipping near 88dB SPL, which puts a hard ceiling on macro dynamics at higher levels
  • Plastic yokes and general material quality draw durability doubts, and clamping force is heavy enough that one reviewer calls it fatiguing

Sivga • Headphones

Sivga Phoenix

Open page

The Sivga Phoenix is a 50mm dynamic open back with CNC-machined zebrawood cups, stainless steel grilles and a listed 296g weight, and the physical product is the least contested part of it: premium materials with no visible flaws, a light clamping force, and a rated 32 ohm, 103 dB load that a phone or dongle drives without help. Tuning is where opinion divides. Listening-based reviews hear a warm, full-bodied signature: textured bass with sub-bass reach unusual for an open design, a lush and expressive midrange, and a treble that sits on the safe side of bright without fatigue. A measurement-based review reached the opposite conclusion, finding the response close to target only between roughly 100 and 500 Hz, with the emphasis concentrated at 200-300 Hz and a shortfall above, which it heard as dull and would not recommend in stock form. That same review reported a dramatic gain in tonal balance and spatial imaging once parametric EQ was applied. Soundstage width is also contested, called fairly modest and narrower than rival open backs in some listening and notably more expansive than a Sennheiser HD 600 in other listening. So are the stock pads, thin enough that one listener felt ears pressing against the driver covers after about an hour, while others logged multi-hour sessions without fatigue. Detail retrieval is a stated limitation: respectable, but described as neither the cleanest nor the most detailed at the price, with micro details sometimes going unnoticed.

Strengths

  • Build and finish read as premium: CNC-machined zebrawood cups, stainless steel grilles and a spring steel headband with no visible flaws.
  • Bass is textured and well controlled, with sub-bass depth and extension described as unusual for an open back at this price.
  • Rated at 32 ohms and 103 dB, so phones, tablets and portable players reach full volume with no desktop amplifier.
  • Light at a listed 296g with a low clamping force, so there is little ear pressure over long sessions.
  • The top end stays on the safe side of bright: crisp, precise cymbals with no harshness and no reported fatigue.
  • Responds strongly to parametric EQ, with correction bringing a dramatic gain in tonal balance and spatial imaging.

Weaknesses

  • Measured response falls short of target above 500 Hz with emphasis piled into 200-300 Hz, which was heard as a dull presentation.
  • Stock pads are thin, and one long-session listener felt ears pressing against the driver covers after about an hour.
  • Resolution is ordinary for the price: not the cleanest or most detailed presentation, and micro details sometimes go unnoticed.
  • Soundstage width is contested, called fairly modest and narrower than rival open backs in some listening.
  • Headband range may run short: fit was flagged as possibly small for larger heads.
  • Measured distortion shows disturbance in the 3 to 6 kHz band, a region where the response is already below target.