Stored Category Comparison

FiiO EH13 vs Sivga Phoenix

This page compares two published headphones profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Back to FiiO EH13Open Sivga Phoenix

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

FiiO EH13
Sivga Phoenix

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisEH13PhoenixDelta
Bass
7.5
7.5
Even
Mids
7.2
6.8
-0.4
Treble
7
6
-1
Technicalities
6.5
6.5
Even
Soundstage
6.8
6.7
-0.1
Value
8.4
7.1
-1.3

Compare To

Compare this headphones against another stored profile.

FiiO EH13 can only be compared against published headphones profiles.

Quick Read

FiiO EH13

Approved-source coverage for the EH13 is still early and thin, but the available material is clear enough on one point: it appears to be a wireless over-ear headphone, not a DAC/amp. Headphonesty’s CanJam NYC 2026 roundup treats it as an inexpensive, feature-rich entry model with LDAC, ANC, app-based parametric EQ, a sapphire-coated 40mm driver, and unusually long battery life for the price. Based on what is currently available, the EH13 looks strongest as a flexible, low-cost lifestyle headphone with more tuning control than most entry-level wireless sets, not as an enthusiast reference device. This dossier should be treated as early coverage pending deeper approved reviews.

Sivga Phoenix

The Sivga Phoenix is a 50mm dynamic open back with CNC-machined zebrawood cups, stainless steel grilles and a listed 296g weight, and the physical product is the least contested part of it: premium materials with no visible flaws, a light clamping force, and a rated 32 ohm, 103 dB load that a phone or dongle drives without help. Tuning is where opinion divides. Listening-based reviews hear a warm, full-bodied signature: textured bass with sub-bass reach unusual for an open design, a lush and expressive midrange, and a treble that sits on the safe side of bright without fatigue. A measurement-based review reached the opposite conclusion, finding the response close to target only between roughly 100 and 500 Hz, with the emphasis concentrated at 200-300 Hz and a shortfall above, which it heard as dull and would not recommend in stock form. That same review reported a dramatic gain in tonal balance and spatial imaging once parametric EQ was applied. Soundstage width is also contested, called fairly modest and narrower than rival open backs in some listening and notably more expansive than a Sennheiser HD 600 in other listening. So are the stock pads, thin enough that one listener felt ears pressing against the driver covers after about an hour, while others logged multi-hour sessions without fatigue. Detail retrieval is a stated limitation: respectable, but described as neither the cleanest nor the most detailed at the price, with micro details sometimes going unnoticed.

FiiO • Headphones

FiiO EH13

Open page

Approved-source coverage for the EH13 is still early and thin, but the available material is clear enough on one point: it appears to be a wireless over-ear headphone, not a DAC/amp. Headphonesty’s CanJam NYC 2026 roundup treats it as an inexpensive, feature-rich entry model with LDAC, ANC, app-based parametric EQ, a sapphire-coated 40mm driver, and unusually long battery life for the price. Based on what is currently available, the EH13 looks strongest as a flexible, low-cost lifestyle headphone with more tuning control than most entry-level wireless sets, not as an enthusiast reference device. This dossier should be treated as early coverage pending deeper approved reviews.

Strengths

  • Very feature-rich for a low entry price
  • Full parametric EQ and LDAC support are standout advantages in the segment
  • Good battery-life story and practical everyday use case

Weaknesses

  • Approved-source review depth is still limited
  • Not positioned as a serious enthusiast reference headphone
  • Performance ceiling is likely defined by convenience rather than outright fidelity

Sivga • Headphones

Sivga Phoenix

Open page

The Sivga Phoenix is a 50mm dynamic open back with CNC-machined zebrawood cups, stainless steel grilles and a listed 296g weight, and the physical product is the least contested part of it: premium materials with no visible flaws, a light clamping force, and a rated 32 ohm, 103 dB load that a phone or dongle drives without help. Tuning is where opinion divides. Listening-based reviews hear a warm, full-bodied signature: textured bass with sub-bass reach unusual for an open design, a lush and expressive midrange, and a treble that sits on the safe side of bright without fatigue. A measurement-based review reached the opposite conclusion, finding the response close to target only between roughly 100 and 500 Hz, with the emphasis concentrated at 200-300 Hz and a shortfall above, which it heard as dull and would not recommend in stock form. That same review reported a dramatic gain in tonal balance and spatial imaging once parametric EQ was applied. Soundstage width is also contested, called fairly modest and narrower than rival open backs in some listening and notably more expansive than a Sennheiser HD 600 in other listening. So are the stock pads, thin enough that one listener felt ears pressing against the driver covers after about an hour, while others logged multi-hour sessions without fatigue. Detail retrieval is a stated limitation: respectable, but described as neither the cleanest nor the most detailed at the price, with micro details sometimes going unnoticed.

Strengths

  • Build and finish read as premium: CNC-machined zebrawood cups, stainless steel grilles and a spring steel headband with no visible flaws.
  • Bass is textured and well controlled, with sub-bass depth and extension described as unusual for an open back at this price.
  • Rated at 32 ohms and 103 dB, so phones, tablets and portable players reach full volume with no desktop amplifier.
  • Light at a listed 296g with a low clamping force, so there is little ear pressure over long sessions.
  • The top end stays on the safe side of bright: crisp, precise cymbals with no harshness and no reported fatigue.
  • Responds strongly to parametric EQ, with correction bringing a dramatic gain in tonal balance and spatial imaging.

Weaknesses

  • Measured response falls short of target above 500 Hz with emphasis piled into 200-300 Hz, which was heard as a dull presentation.
  • Stock pads are thin, and one long-session listener felt ears pressing against the driver covers after about an hour.
  • Resolution is ordinary for the price: not the cleanest or most detailed presentation, and micro details sometimes go unnoticed.
  • Soundstage width is contested, called fairly modest and narrower than rival open backs in some listening.
  • Headband range may run short: fit was flagged as possibly small for larger heads.
  • Measured distortion shows disturbance in the 3 to 6 kHz band, a region where the response is already below target.