Stored Category Comparison

Empire Ears Odin MKII vs Noble Audio Onyx

This page compares two published iems profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

Empire Ears Odin MKII
Noble Audio Onyx

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisOdin MKIIOnyxDelta
Bass
9.2
8.8
-0.4
Mids
8.8
8.7
-0.1
Treble
9
8.6
-0.4
Technicalities
9.5
9
-0.5
Soundstage
9.1
8.9
-0.2
Value
7.2
7.3
+0.1

Compare To

Compare this iems against another stored profile.

Empire Ears Odin MKII can only be compared against published iems profiles.

Quick Read

Empire Ears Odin MKII

Current approved coverage treats the Odin MKII as a genuine summit-fi revision rather than a cosmetic refresh. MajorHiFi’s dedicated review and Odin comparison both point in the same direction: the MKII keeps the Odin line’s elite resolution and bass authority, but adds more sub-bass body, fuller mids, smoother treble, and slightly more immersive spatial layering. It remains a high-price flagship built around scale, grip, and precision, but the tuning now feels less sterile and more emotionally engaging than the original. The main caveat is value: it is still priced for committed flagship buyers, and its presentation remains more intense and performance-led than relaxed or easygoing.

Noble Audio Onyx

Across Headfonia and Bloom’s approved coverage, the Onyx comes through as a premium, neutral-warm quadbrid that majors on polish, immersion, and textured low-end power rather than exaggerated V-shape theatrics. The bass is repeatedly described as strong and controlled, the mids clear and full, and the stage spacious enough to give flagship material a convincing sense of scale. The Onyx is also framed as an endgame-style listen with upscale build and presentation. Its compromises are predictable for the class: price is steep, and its character leans more toward refined fullness and immersive richness than aggressive excitement.

Empire Ears • IEMs

Empire Ears Odin MKII

Open page

Current approved coverage treats the Odin MKII as a genuine summit-fi revision rather than a cosmetic refresh. MajorHiFi’s dedicated review and Odin comparison both point in the same direction: the MKII keeps the Odin line’s elite resolution and bass authority, but adds more sub-bass body, fuller mids, smoother treble, and slightly more immersive spatial layering. It remains a high-price flagship built around scale, grip, and precision, but the tuning now feels less sterile and more emotionally engaging than the original. The main caveat is value: it is still priced for committed flagship buyers, and its presentation remains more intense and performance-led than relaxed or easygoing.

Strengths

  • Exceptional resolution, layering, and flagship bass control
  • Fuller and more organic midrange than the original Odin
  • Refined treble with strong air and less fatigue risk

Weaknesses

  • Extremely expensive even by flagship IEM standards
  • Still tuned more for performance and impact than laid-back comfort
  • Not the broadest value proposition unless you specifically want a summit-fi statement piece

Noble Audio • IEMs

Noble Audio Onyx

Open page

Across Headfonia and Bloom’s approved coverage, the Onyx comes through as a premium, neutral-warm quadbrid that majors on polish, immersion, and textured low-end power rather than exaggerated V-shape theatrics. The bass is repeatedly described as strong and controlled, the mids clear and full, and the stage spacious enough to give flagship material a convincing sense of scale. The Onyx is also framed as an endgame-style listen with upscale build and presentation. Its compromises are predictable for the class: price is steep, and its character leans more toward refined fullness and immersive richness than aggressive excitement.

Strengths

  • Controlled, textured low end with real flagship scale
  • Clear, full mids with strong spatial placement
  • Premium build, cable, and overall presentation

Weaknesses

  • Very expensive even in the flagship segment
  • Less overtly thrilling than more aggressive V-shaped competitors
  • Best value depends on already shopping at the endgame tier