Stored Category Comparison

Chord Mojo 2 vs Topping DX5 II

This page compares two published dacs profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Back to Chord Mojo 2Open Topping DX5 II

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

Chord Mojo 2
Topping DX5 II

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisMojo 2DX5 IIDelta
Bass
8.5
8.2
-0.3
Mids
8.6
8.1
-0.5
Treble
8.3
8.2
-0.1
Technicalities
8.5
8.6
+0.1
Soundstage
8.2
7.9
-0.3
Value
7.8
8.7
+0.9

Compare To

Compare this dacs against another stored profile.

Chord Mojo 2 can only be compared against published dacs profiles.

Quick Read

Chord Mojo 2

Six years after the original defined the category, the Mojo 2 updated Chord's FPGA-based portable DAC/amp with finer filtering, the lossless UHD DSP tone system, 32bit/768kHz support, and 600mW of output at £449. Approved reviews agree the sequel earns the name: Headfonics hears a more accurate, more energetic presentation than the V1 with the DSP applied seamlessly (no dynamic-range or volume penalty) while MajorHiFi and Headfonia treat it as the transportable benchmark for musical, dense, analog-flavored sound. Standing criticisms: the polychromatic button interface remains famously cryptic, there is no proper desktop-charging thermal comfort, and phone-stack ergonomics lag dongle rivals.

Topping DX5 II

The DX5 II may be the strongest $299 desk box of its generation: dual ES9039Q2M DACs, up to 7.6W of balanced headphone power, on-board parametric EQ, and a customizable UI, measured by Audio Science Review at under 0.00006% THD+N: performance they call essentially without fault. Headfonics' subjective take matches: lots of clean power that drives most headphones, valuable features, and granular PEQ tuning. The consensus criticisms are minor: Topping's clean-neutral house sound offers no romance, the feature depth hides behind menus, and the crowded sub-$300 all-in-one segment includes serious competition.

Chord • DACs

Chord Mojo 2

Open page

Six years after the original defined the category, the Mojo 2 updated Chord's FPGA-based portable DAC/amp with finer filtering, the lossless UHD DSP tone system, 32bit/768kHz support, and 600mW of output at £449. Approved reviews agree the sequel earns the name: Headfonics hears a more accurate, more energetic presentation than the V1 with the DSP applied seamlessly (no dynamic-range or volume penalty) while MajorHiFi and Headfonia treat it as the transportable benchmark for musical, dense, analog-flavored sound. Standing criticisms: the polychromatic button interface remains famously cryptic, there is no proper desktop-charging thermal comfort, and phone-stack ergonomics lag dongle rivals.

Strengths

  • Class-reference musical density and timbre from Chord's FPGA approach
  • Lossless UHD DSP tone controls with zero dynamic-range penalty
  • 600mW drives IEMs and most headphones with authority

Weaknesses

  • Cryptic color-coded sphere interface still needs the manual
  • Bulkier and less phone-friendly than modern dongles
  • Battery management and heat remain the platform's weak spot

Topping • DACs

Topping DX5 II

Open page

The DX5 II may be the strongest $299 desk box of its generation: dual ES9039Q2M DACs, up to 7.6W of balanced headphone power, on-board parametric EQ, and a customizable UI, measured by Audio Science Review at under 0.00006% THD+N: performance they call essentially without fault. Headfonics' subjective take matches: lots of clean power that drives most headphones, valuable features, and granular PEQ tuning. The consensus criticisms are minor: Topping's clean-neutral house sound offers no romance, the feature depth hides behind menus, and the crowded sub-$300 all-in-one segment includes serious competition.

Strengths

  • State-of-the-art measurements: sub-0.00006% THD+N at $299
  • 7.6W balanced output drives nearly any headphone
  • On-device parametric EQ and DSP with a customizable UI

Weaknesses

  • Clinically neutral character with no flavor options
  • Menu-driven depth has a learning curve
  • Fierce competition in the sub-$300 all-in-one class