Stored Category Comparison

7Hz Timeless II vs Noble Audio Onyx

This page compares two published iems profiles using stored summaries, source-attributed scoring, and a single lines-only radar for fast visual difference checks.

Sound Profile Radar

Hover any axis point to see both stored scores for that exact category edge.

7Hz Timeless II
Noble Audio Onyx

Category Scores

Stored score comparison

Every score is pulled from the stored product intelligence snapshot for this category pair.

AxisTimeless IIOnyxDelta
Bass
8.1
8.8
+0.7
Mids
7.6
8.7
+1.1
Treble
7.9
8.6
+0.7
Technicalities
8.4
9
+0.6
Soundstage
8.2
8.9
+0.7
Value
7.8
7.3
-0.5

Compare To

Compare this iems against another stored profile.

7Hz Timeless II can only be compared against published iems profiles.

Quick Read

7Hz Timeless II

Approved coverage treats the Timeless II as a real second-generation effort rather than a rebadge: the dual-sided 14.5mm planar brings the punchy, fast bass the original was loved for, while the treble extends further and the stage opens up. The consensus verdict is that it is one of the strongest planar IEMs near $229, with the familiar planar caveats: upper-midrange energy that can turn edgy on bright recordings, and a large disc-shaped shell that not every ear tolerates. Compared with the original Timeless, reviewers hear a more refined, more extended, and slightly more expensive-sounding tuning, at a price that moved up alongside it.

Noble Audio Onyx

Across Headfonia and Bloom’s approved coverage, the Onyx comes through as a premium, neutral-warm quadbrid that majors on polish, immersion, and textured low-end power rather than exaggerated V-shape theatrics. The bass is repeatedly described as strong and controlled, the mids clear and full, and the stage spacious enough to give flagship material a convincing sense of scale. The Onyx is also framed as an endgame-style listen with upscale build and presentation. Its compromises are predictable for the class: price is steep, and its character leans more toward refined fullness and immersive richness than aggressive excitement.

7Hz • IEMs

7Hz Timeless II

Open page

Approved coverage treats the Timeless II as a real second-generation effort rather than a rebadge: the dual-sided 14.5mm planar brings the punchy, fast bass the original was loved for, while the treble extends further and the stage opens up. The consensus verdict is that it is one of the strongest planar IEMs near $229, with the familiar planar caveats: upper-midrange energy that can turn edgy on bright recordings, and a large disc-shaped shell that not every ear tolerates. Compared with the original Timeless, reviewers hear a more refined, more extended, and slightly more expensive-sounding tuning, at a price that moved up alongside it.

Strengths

  • Fast, punchy planar bass with strong control and impact
  • Improved treble extension and openness over the original Timeless
  • Wide, immersive staging for a planar IEM at this price

Weaknesses

  • Upper mids can sound harsh or intense on brighter tracks
  • Large disc-style shells remain a fit gamble for smaller ears
  • Price moved up versus the original, thinning its value edge

Noble Audio • IEMs

Noble Audio Onyx

Open page

Across Headfonia and Bloom’s approved coverage, the Onyx comes through as a premium, neutral-warm quadbrid that majors on polish, immersion, and textured low-end power rather than exaggerated V-shape theatrics. The bass is repeatedly described as strong and controlled, the mids clear and full, and the stage spacious enough to give flagship material a convincing sense of scale. The Onyx is also framed as an endgame-style listen with upscale build and presentation. Its compromises are predictable for the class: price is steep, and its character leans more toward refined fullness and immersive richness than aggressive excitement.

Strengths

  • Controlled, textured low end with real flagship scale
  • Clear, full mids with strong spatial placement
  • Premium build, cable, and overall presentation

Weaknesses

  • Very expensive even in the flagship segment
  • Less overtly thrilling than more aggressive V-shaped competitors
  • Best value depends on already shopping at the endgame tier